Hannah/3w Bateman
F, #8131, (28 September 1645 - 1 January 1678/79)
Hannah/3w Bateman|b. 28 Sep 1645\nd. 1 Jan 1678/79|p814.htm#i8131|Thomas/2 Bateman|b. 1614\nd. 6 Feb 1669|p354.htm#i3536|Martha/2w Brooks|b. say 1626\nd. 3 Aug 1665|p813.htm#i8125|Sgt. William/1 Bateman|b. say 1580\nd. 1658|p1328.htm#i13280||||Henry/1w Brooks|b. circa 1592\nd. 12 Apr 1683|p262.htm#i2619|(–?–) (–?–)|d. before 1650||
| Father* | Thomas/2 Bateman1 b. 1614, d. 6 Feb 1669 |
| Mother* | Martha/2w Brooks1 b. s 1626, d. 3 Aug 1665 |
| Appears on charts: | Descendants of Henry1w Brooks Descendants of Martha/2w Brooks |
| Last Edited | 31 May 2008 |
Hannah/3w Bateman was born 28 Sep 1645 at Concord, MA.1 She married, 12 Jun 1667 at Woburn, Zachariah/3 Converse of Woburn, son of Allen/2 Converse and Elizabeth (–?–).2 She died at Woburn 1 Jan 1678/79 at age 33.3 There he died three weeks later, 22 Jan 1678/79.4
Family | Zachariah/3 Converse b. 11 Oct 1642, d. 22 Jan 1678/79 |
| Children |
|
Source Citations/Notes:
- [S185] Concord BMD, 5, Hannah Bateman b.
- [S210] Johnson, Woburn Records, 3:20, Hannah Bateman/Zachariah Converse m.
- [S210] Johnson, Woburn Records, 2:39, Hannah Converse d.
- [S210] Johnson, Woburn Records, 2:39, Zachariah Converse d.
- [S210] Johnson, Woburn Records, 1:57, Zachariah Converse b.
- [S210] Johnson, Woburn Records, 1:57, Elizabeth Converse b.
- [S210] Johnson, Woburn Records, 1:57, Ruth Converse b.; 2:39, d.
Samuel/3w Bateman
M, #8132, (7 February 1648/49 - 1 November 1690)
Samuel/3w Bateman|b. 7 Feb 1648/49\nd. 1 Nov 1690|p814.htm#i8132|Thomas/2 Bateman|b. 1614\nd. 6 Feb 1669|p354.htm#i3536|Martha/2w Brooks|b. say 1626\nd. 3 Aug 1665|p813.htm#i8125|Sgt. William/1 Bateman|b. say 1580\nd. 1658|p1328.htm#i13280||||Henry/1w Brooks|b. circa 1592\nd. 12 Apr 1683|p262.htm#i2619|(–?–) (–?–)|d. before 1650||
| Father* | Thomas/2 Bateman1 b. 1614, d. 6 Feb 1669 |
| Mother* | Martha/2w Brooks1 b. s 1626, d. 3 Aug 1665 |
| Appears on charts: | Descendants of Henry1w Brooks Descendants of Martha/2w Brooks |
| Last Edited | 30 May 2008 |
Samuel/3w Bateman was born 7 Feb 1648/49 at Concord, MA.1 Probably the Samuel Bateman who died, 1 Nov 1690 at Cape Breton in the Phips expedition against Port Royal.2,3
"The opening event of colonial military effort in King William's War was the expedition of Sir William Phips against Port Royal, which sailed from Nantasket, Boston Harbor, on April 28, 1690, in five ships with a force of several hundred. This Nova Scotia fort, with its small garrison outnumbered, soon surrendered, May 11, 1690, and the colonists gathered their plunder. A Congress of the colonies of Massachusetts, Plymouth, and New York voted for a combined expedition against Canada and this was the first instance of the Americans acting together in a formal undertaking against a common foreign enemy.
"Here was planned a joint movement with a land force marching from Albany to attack Montreal and a fleet from Boston to move against Quebec. The plan was of interest as the movement was essayed by the colonies without proper preparation and without consultation with the English Government. The land expedition was inadequately organized and equipped, and lacking the quotas of troops promised by the colonies involved, met with difficulties from the outset. A dispute over the position of joint commander, lack of suitable equipment, and an almost entire incapacity to carry on such an expedition, among other causes, led to its collapse and somewhat ignominious return after it had reached Wood Creek near the southern end of Lake Champlain. This futile attempt clearly showed the inability of the colonies at that time to organize for successful co-operative military action independent of England, and emphasized the inadequacy of the strength of men and of equipment they could assemble.
"The sea expedition against Quebec which left Boston on August 9, 1690, in some thirty-two vessels of various sorts and sizes, and aggregating some 2200 men, while it reached its destination was hardly more successful. Various delays enabled reinforcements under Frontenac to reach Quebec which was able to resist siege from a landing force and bombardment by the fleet. Not only was there lack of success in gaining the objective but the troops suffered from disease and exposure, while the cost of the expedition almost bankrupted the Colony of Massachusetts Bay. Again this costly demonstration of the incompetence of the leaders for such an enterprise outside of their own boundaries, showed that, notwithstanding the bravery of the land forces under Major John Walley, no measure of success against a foe well organized and led could be expected in the absence of trained commanders and disciplined and seasoned troops."4
"The opening event of colonial military effort in King William's War was the expedition of Sir William Phips against Port Royal, which sailed from Nantasket, Boston Harbor, on April 28, 1690, in five ships with a force of several hundred. This Nova Scotia fort, with its small garrison outnumbered, soon surrendered, May 11, 1690, and the colonists gathered their plunder. A Congress of the colonies of Massachusetts, Plymouth, and New York voted for a combined expedition against Canada and this was the first instance of the Americans acting together in a formal undertaking against a common foreign enemy.
"Here was planned a joint movement with a land force marching from Albany to attack Montreal and a fleet from Boston to move against Quebec. The plan was of interest as the movement was essayed by the colonies without proper preparation and without consultation with the English Government. The land expedition was inadequately organized and equipped, and lacking the quotas of troops promised by the colonies involved, met with difficulties from the outset. A dispute over the position of joint commander, lack of suitable equipment, and an almost entire incapacity to carry on such an expedition, among other causes, led to its collapse and somewhat ignominious return after it had reached Wood Creek near the southern end of Lake Champlain. This futile attempt clearly showed the inability of the colonies at that time to organize for successful co-operative military action independent of England, and emphasized the inadequacy of the strength of men and of equipment they could assemble.
"The sea expedition against Quebec which left Boston on August 9, 1690, in some thirty-two vessels of various sorts and sizes, and aggregating some 2200 men, while it reached its destination was hardly more successful. Various delays enabled reinforcements under Frontenac to reach Quebec which was able to resist siege from a landing force and bombardment by the fleet. Not only was there lack of success in gaining the objective but the troops suffered from disease and exposure, while the cost of the expedition almost bankrupted the Colony of Massachusetts Bay. Again this costly demonstration of the incompetence of the leaders for such an enterprise outside of their own boundaries, showed that, notwithstanding the bravery of the land forces under Major John Walley, no measure of success against a foe well organized and led could be expected in the absence of trained commanders and disciplined and seasoned troops."4
Nathaniel/2 Ball
M, #8133, (circa 1625 - 14 January 1705/6)
Nathaniel/2 Ball|b. circa 1625\nd. 14 Jan 1705/6|p814.htm#i8133|John/1 Ball|b. circa 1585\nd. 1 Nov 1655|p511.htm#i5108|Joanna King|b. say 1590||||||||William King|b. say 1560||Mary (–?–)|b. say 1560||
| Father* | John/1 Ball1,2 b. c 1585, d. 1 Nov 1655 |
| Mother-Can* | Joanna King2 b. s 1590 |
| Last Edited | 20 May 2008 |
Nathaniel/2 Ball was born circa 1625, supposedly in Wiltshire, England.2 He emigrated, date unascertained, with his father and brother John to Massachusetts, where they lived at Watertown.1,3 He married (1), about 1648, Mary (probably Wayne or perhaps Gove). (The will of dea. Ralph/1 Mousall of Charlestown, 13 Apr 1657, leaves cousin Nathaniell Ball and cousin Mary Waine £4 apiece, and also mentions daughter [ward] Mary Gove.).4,2 Nathaniel settled at Concord, where he was allotted 13 acres for a homestead.5 His father John Ball lived his last years with Nathaniel at Concord before his death 1 Nov 1655.2
Nathaniel lived on the Bedford Road, in the East Quarter of Concord (later set off to Bedford), where his taxes on 11 lots comprising 137 acres were abated in 1666.6 His wife Mary died at Concord 14 Feb 1669.7 There he married (2), 7 Feb 1670, Margery (Margaret) Knight, widow of Thomas/2 Bateman.8 He died at Concord 14 Jan 1705/6.9 There his widow died 18 Apr 1709.10
Nathaniel lived on the Bedford Road, in the East Quarter of Concord (later set off to Bedford), where his taxes on 11 lots comprising 137 acres were abated in 1666.6 His wife Mary died at Concord 14 Feb 1669.7 There he married (2), 7 Feb 1670, Margery (Margaret) Knight, widow of Thomas/2 Bateman.8 He died at Concord 14 Jan 1705/6.9 There his widow died 18 Apr 1709.10
Family 1 | Mary Wayne b. s 1627, d. 14 Feb 1669 |
| Children |
|
Family 2 | Margery (Margaret) Knight b. s 1650, d. 18 Apr 1709 |
Source Citations/Notes:
- [S83] Bond, Watertown Genealogies, 1:11, John (1.) Ball.
- [S1093] Mrs. George H. Ball and Frank D. Warren, "Descs. of John Ball of Watertown", 1, John (1.) Ball.
- [S222] Paige, "Massachusetts Freemen", 22, Nathaniell Bale, John Ball.
- [S648] Anderson et al, The Great Migration Begins, Mousall, Ralph.
- [S1093] Mrs. George H. Ball and Frank D. Warren, "Descs. of John Ball of Watertown", 1, Nathaniel (3.) Ball.
- [S182] Shattuck, Hist. Concord, 37, 1666 tax list.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 14, Mary Ball d.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 15, nathanewell ball/margry batman m.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 69, Nathanll Ball d.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 74, Margery Ball d.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 6, John Ball d.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 5, Nathaniel Ball b.; 6, Nathaniell Ball d.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 110, Ebenezer Ball d.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 57, Eliazer Ball d.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 9, John Balle b.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 11, nathanell Balle b.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 12, hanna Ball b.
Dorothy/2 Potter
F, #8137, (circa 1662 - 15 March 1752)
Dorothy/2 Potter|b. circa 1662\nd. 15 Mar 1752|p814.htm#i8137|Dea. Luke/1 Potter|b. 18 Oct 1615\nd. 13 Oct 1697|p510.htm#i5093|Mary/2 Edmunds|b. circa 1628\nd. 15 Feb 1710/11|p539.htm#i5386|Jeffrey/a Potter|b. 2 Oct 1575|p5844.htm#i58436|Agnes (Anne) Beard|b. say 1577\nd. between 1644 and May 1648|p5844.htm#i58435|Walter/1 Edmunds|b. circa 1595|p5844.htm#i58433|Dorothy (–?–)|b. say 1597||
| Father* | Dea. Luke/1 Potter1 b. 18 Oct 1615, d. 13 Oct 1697 |
| Mother* | Mary/2 Edmunds1 b. c 1628, d. 15 Feb 1710/11 |
| Appears on charts: | Descendants of Capt. Thomas/1a Brooks Descendants of Dea. Joshua/2a Brooks Descendants of Noah/3a Brooks |
| Last Edited | 18 Dec 2010 |

Gravestone of Dorothy (Potter) Brooks, wife of Noah, Hill Burying Ground, Concord, MA. (Courtesy John Brooks Threlfall)
(Savage and Bond erroneously identify Noah's wife as Dorothy Wright, but the will of Dea. Luke Potter names daughter Dorothy Brooks. Luke's son Judah/2 Potter married Noah's sister Grace/3 Brooks. Luke Potter was one of three men who returned the inventory of Noah's grandfather Capt. Thomas Brooks.).3,4,5 Daughter Dorothy Brooks, "already given to," is mentioned in Luke Potter's will, dated 11 Jun 1695.2
Noah died in that part of Concord which had become Acton 1 Feb 1738/39.6,7 Dorothy died 15 Mar 1752 (c.r.).8 "Their grave stones are still extant in the old Hill cemetery [in Concord] though all that is left of his is the bottom part with his age," writes Threlfall.9,4
Family | Noah/3a Brooks b. 1656 or 1657, d. 1 Feb 1738/39 |
| Children |
|
Source Citations/Notes:
- [S185] Concord BMD, 5, Dorothy Potter b.
- [S1405] Threlfall, Ancestors, 258, Luke Potter.
- [S221] Torrey, New England Marriages, 103, Noah Brooks.
- [S282] Threlfall, "Thomas Brooks", 11.
- [S516] Potter, Old Families of Concord, 13, Luke and Mary Potter, Dorothy [543.]: 1685.
- [S53] Gravestone, recorded 21 Aug 1996: 1 Feb 1738.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 143, Noah Broks d.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 415, widow Dorothy Brooks d. (c.r.).
- [S53] Gravestone, recorded 21 Aug 1996.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 34, Dorothy Brookes b.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 32, Joshua Brookes b.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 34, Ebenezer Brookes b.
- [S36] Savage, 1:261.
- [S83] Bond, Watertown Genealogies, 2:722.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 45, Benjamin Brookes b.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 47, Mary Brookes b.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 51, Thomas Brookes b.
- [S185] Concord BMD, 60, Elizabeth Brookes b.
Close